2004 Audi RS4 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2004 Audi RS4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 530 kg more than 2004 Audi RS4.
Because 2004 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi RS4 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS4 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 376 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 95 L |
