2004 Audi RS6 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi RS6 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS6 | 60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 445 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3230 mm |
