2004 Audi RS6 vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 1036 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Maserati 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi RS6 | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
| Make | Audi | Maserati |
| Model | RS6 | 6C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 445 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 804 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
