2004 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (445 HP) has 265 more horse power than 2000 Vector RD 180. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Vector RD 180. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi RS6 | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
| Make | Audi | Vector |
| Model | RS6 | RD 180 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 445 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2390 mm |
