2004 Audi RS6 vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 2004 Audi RS6. (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi RS6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 830 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi RS6. (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi RS6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi RS6 | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Audi | Lotec |
Model | RS6 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |