2004 Audi RS6 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2004 Audi RS6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 381 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 442 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi RS6 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | RS6 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 445 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |