2004 Audi RS6 vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 247 more horse power than 2008 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 597 kg more than 2008 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi RS6 | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Audi | Acura |
Model | RS6 | CSX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |