2004 Audi RS6 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi RS6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi RS6 weights approximately 452 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi RS6 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | RS6 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 47 L |