2004 Audi S4 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2004 Audi S4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi S4 (339 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi S4 weights approximately 547 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi S4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi S4 (410 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi S4 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S4 | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4170 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 339 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |
