2004 Audi S4 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi S4 (339 HP) has 269 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi S4 weights approximately 916 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi S4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi S4 (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2004 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi S4 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Audi | MCC |
Model | S4 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1810 mm |