2004 Audi TT vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 215 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |