2004 Audi TT vs. 1950 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 260 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 1950 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1950 Jaguar MK V | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | TT | MK V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3485 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2900 mm |
