2004 Audi TT vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 465 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1960 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Audi | DKW |
| Model | TT | Munga |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 31 L |
