2004 Audi TT vs. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk

To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,050 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.

Because 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2004 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi TT 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk
Make Audi Studebaker
Model TT Silver Hawk
Year Released 2004 1960
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1780 cc 3050 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 76.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 111 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 7.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1340 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 5190 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 3070 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]