2004 Audi TT vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 314 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | TT | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
