2004 Audi TT vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 618 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | DeVille |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 208 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 82 L |