2004 Audi TT vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 376 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Grand Wagoneer |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 4980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3450 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 316 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |