2004 Audi TT vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 753 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | TT | Continental |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 7043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2328 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |
