2004 Audi TT vs. 1962 Steyr 700C
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 984 kg more than 1962 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Steyr 700C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1962 Steyr 700C | |
| Make | Audi | Steyr |
| Model | TT | 700C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 641 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1950 mm |
