2004 Audi TT vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 390 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | EH |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |