2004 Audi TT vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1965 MG MGC | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | TT | MGC |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |
