2004 Audi TT vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 595 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications: