2004 Audi TT vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 435 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
Model | TT | Tiger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 27 L |