2004 Audi TT vs. 1966 MG 1100
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1966 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 595 kg more than 1966 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1966 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | TT | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1096 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
