2004 Audi TT vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 164 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Park Lane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 6722 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 602 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 103 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3130 mm |