2004 Audi TT vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 214 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |
