2004 Audi TT vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 873 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | TT | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 72.7 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 702 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |