2004 Audi TT vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 564 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |
