2004 Audi TT vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (106 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 1975 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |