2004 Audi TT vs. 1975 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1975 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1975 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 115 kg more than 1975 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 NSU Ro 80. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1975 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Audi | NSU |
Model | TT | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 37 L |