2004 Audi TT vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 829 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | TT | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1940 mm |
