2004 Audi TT vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240.
Because 1976 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | TT | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2650 mm |