2004 Audi TT vs. 1979 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 285 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 1979 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1979 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Impala |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2960 mm |