2004 Audi TT vs. 1979 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 100 kg more than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1979 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |
