2004 Audi TT vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep. (103 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (225 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1979 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Jeep |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |