2004 Audi TT vs. 1981 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1981 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 515 kg more than 1981 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1981 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |