2004 Audi TT vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 190 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | 929 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |
