2004 Audi TT vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 365 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Sapporo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2520 mm |