2004 Audi TT vs. 1986 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. (91 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 124 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. (182 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1986 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Blazer |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |