2004 Audi TT vs. 1986 Chevrolet Sprint
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Sprint. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Sprint would be higher. At 1,754 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Sprint. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Sprint. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 745 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Sprint. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Sprint. (77 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Sprint.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1986 Chevrolet Sprint | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Sprint |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 77 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2260 mm |