2004 Audi TT vs. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 374 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |