2004 Audi TT vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 215 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | Apollo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |