2004 Audi TT vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Sigma |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |