2004 Audi TT vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 195 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi TT | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Plymouth |
| Model | TT | Colt |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1754 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |
