2004 Audi TT vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 290 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | Midge |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |