2004 Audi TT vs. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. (187 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 570 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Suburban (407 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1995 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Suburban |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 5731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3350 mm |