2004 Audi TT vs. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. (223 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 645 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Land Rover |
Model | TT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |