2004 Audi TT vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 275 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 1995 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1754 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 77 L |