2004 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (146 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 196 kg more than 2004 Audi TT.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | MPV |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |