2004 Audi TT vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2004 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi TT | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 400 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |